-
The Eligibility Paradox: Why Disability Service Assessments Often Misrepresent Need
Introduction Disability eligibility assessments, particularly those relying on Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs), are cornerstones of state disability service systems like those in Illinois. These functional scoring systems aim to quantify need for rehabilitation programs and benefits, yet they often unintentionally misrepresent true…
-
The Intersectionality of Inclusion: Beyond the 2026 WIOA Plan
Introduction to Intersectionality in Workforce Inclusion Inclusion in workforce development extends beyond traditional rehabilitation policies, embracing “intersectionality” —the interconnected nature of social categorizations like race, gender, disability, and socioeconomic status that create overlapping systems of disadvantage or privilege.[1] The 2026 Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) State Plan modifications emphasize…
-
FY 2026 Federal Rehabilitation Policy: Key Changes and Counselor Impact
Overview of FY 2026 Rehabilitation Services Funding The U.S. Department of Education’s FY 2026 budget request for Rehabilitation Services totals $4.56 billion in mandatory and discretionary funding, emphasizing vocational rehabilitation (VR) for individuals with disabilities through direct services.[1] This includes $4.50 billion for the VR State Grants program, adjusted via…
-
“Institutionalization Reimagined: How Disability Systems Shape Dependence”
Institutionalization Without Walls: How Modern Disability Systems Reproduce Dependence In modern disability services, institutionalization is no longer defined by the walls of large state hospitals. Today, it often occurs quietly through bureaucratic systems, eligibility frameworks, and service structures that, paradoxically, are designed to promote independence. As a sociologist and clinical…