Rehabilitation Reform

Original research and policy proposals on disability rights, community integration, and rehabilitation systems — evidence-informed perspectives for professionals, advocates, and policymakers.

FLAGSHIP RESEARCH

The State Community Integration Index (SCII)

A multi-domain assessment of how all 50 states are meeting — or failing to meet — the legal mandate of Olmstead v. L.C. and the Americans with Disabilities Act. The 2026 pilot ranks states across six policy domains, from Vermont (84, Leading) to Mississippi (27, Critical) — a 57-point spread driven by policy choices, not resource scarcity alone.

By Candace Metcalf, CRC, LPC · Methodology v2.0 · 2026

The State of the Rehabilitation Field: Systemic Diagnostics, Clinical Gaps, and a Legislative Roadmap

A Medical-Sociology Policy Analysis of Environmental Burden, Transit Inequity, and Disability

---

Abstract

Rehabilitation policy cannot be reduced to clinic-level technique. Functional recovery is produced—or interrupted—by the social and spatial environments in which people live, travel, and receive care. Drawing on environmental-justice research, transportation equity analysis, disability epidemiology, and rehabilitation outcomes literature, this paper argues that populations defined by race, income, disability status, and vehicle access are systematically concentrated in high-burden geographies. Those geographies are characterized by proximity to high-volume roadways, elevated exposure to traffic-related air pollution (TRAP), and fragile links between home and post-acute services. Using Location Quotient (LQ) diagnostics from a state-level environmental-justice assessment as a case illustration, and situating those findings in national evidence, the analysis identifies a “psychosocial fracture” in the continuum of care: missed or delayed therapy that is produced by transportation and environmental systems rather than by clinical incompetence. Reform is framed as health infrastructure. Recommendations address certificate-of-need and facility siting, trauma-informed environmental assessment, language access, coordinated human-services transportation, and data-aligned discharge planning.

Keywords: rehabilitation policy, environmental justice, disability, transit equity, social determinants of health, care transitions, location quotient

---

Executive Summary

The rehabilitation field sits at the intersection of environmental justice, transit accessibility, and clinical outcomes. A substantial body of research now documents that people with disabilities, racialized minorities, and low-income households are more likely to live in neighborhoods with elevated fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and closer proximity to pollution sources (Chakraborty, 2020, 2022; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA], 2024). Residential proximity to major roadways is associated with asthma morbidity, reduced lung-function growth, accelerated physical-function decline in later life, and elevated risk of developmental delay in young children (Gauderman et al., 2007; Ha et al., 2019; Hauptman et al., 2020; Weuve et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2022). These exposures are not merely comorbidities. They are functional stressors that reduce exercise tolerance, complicate discharge, and increase the probability that a rehabilitation episode will fail after the patient leaves the facility.

State transportation-equity analyses using LQ methods show how this concentration is spatially organized. In Rhode Island’s Long-Range Transportation Plan environmental-justice assessment, minority residents and low-income residents were disproportionately located within a 250-foot interstate buffer, and that disproportionality increased between 2010 and 2018 even as the statewide minority share declined (Rhode Island Division of Statewide Planning [RIDSP], 2020). Nearly half of census tracts meeting significance thresholds contained above-average concentrations of people with disabilities; nearly two in five contained above-average concentrations of carless households (RIDSP, 2020; U.S. Census Bureau, 2018). Transit buffers show higher relative access for these groups, but that access is a paradox: the same populations are more transit-dependent, so service failure becomes a clinical event.

This paper treats that pattern as a systems diagnosis. Rehabilitation reform is not only a medical necessity. It is a policy response to documented, spatially stratified health burdens.

---

Macro-Landscape and Systemic Diagnostics

Medical Sociology and the Patient’s Environment

In medical sociology, illness careers and recovery trajectories are structured by what Link and Phelan (1995) termed fundamental causes: resources that shape exposure to risks and access to protective interventions across changing mechanisms. Disability scholars have extended this insight. People with disabilities experience systematic health disparities that cannot be reduced to underlying impairment alone; they include poorer access to care, higher poverty, and environments that convert impairment into restricted participation (Krahn et al., 2015; World Health Organization [WHO], 2001). The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) locates activity and participation in an environmental context (WHO, 2001). When the environment is hostile—polluted corridors, inaccessible transit, long first- and last-mile gaps—the clinic’s gains are structurally reversible.

Environmental justice research has historically centered race and class (Bullard, 2000; Mohai et al., 2009). Disability remains under-theorized in that literature, but the empirical gap is closing. National tract-level analysis finds higher percentages of people with disabilities—especially those with cognitive and independent-living difficulties—in neighborhoods with greater PM2.5 exposure after controls for race/ethnicity, poverty, age, density, and metropolitan status (Chakraborty, 2022). Intersectional work in Houston’s Harris County shows people with disabilities disproportionately proximate to Superfund sites, hazardous-waste facilities, and motor-vehicle traffic, with amplified “multiple jeopardy” where disability coincides with racialized minority status and older age (Chakraborty, 2020). These findings matter clinically: TRAP is associated with faster progression of physical disability among older adults (Weuve et al., 2016) and with poorer physical functioning among those living within 200 meters of a major road (Zhang et al., 2022).

Location Quotient as a Macro Diagnostic

LQ is an established planning metric for comparing the concentration of a population in a study area to its share in a reference geography. Federal transportation-equity guidance treats LQ > 1 as evidence of relative overrepresentation and therefore as a flag for benefits-and-burdens analysis (Federal Highway Administration [FHWA], 2019; RIDSP, 2020). The method is not a substitute for individual clinical intake. Tracts that intersect an environmental buffer are not identical to the population living inside the buffer; ACS estimates have margins of error; and LQ cannot, by itself, establish causation. Used correctly, it is a screening instrument: it identifies where environmental and social burdens are disproportionately stacked and where rehabilitation demand is likely to be both high and hard to serve.

Rhode Island’s 2040 environmental-justice analysis applied LQ to census tracts intersecting a 250-foot buffer around interstates (I-95, I-195, I-295) and a half-mile buffer around RIPTA bus stops, using 2018 ACS five-year estimates compared with 2010 Census benchmarks (RIDSP, 2020; U.S. Census Bureau, 2018). Select population groups (SPGs) included minority residents, Hispanic/Latino residents, persons below 200% of the federal poverty level, people with disabilities as defined by ACS functional items, limited-English-proficient (LEP) persons, and zero-vehicle households (RIDSP, 2020).

Structural Inequities and Demographic Stratification

The state’s own diagnostics describe a concentration effect. Minority residents comprised 19.1% of the state population but met or exceeded that threshold in 36.3% of analyzed tracts. Persons below 200% of poverty comprised 28.3% of the state population but clustered in 42.9% of burden tracts. People with disabilities averaged 13.6% statewide, yet 49.6% of tracts meeting significance thresholds contained above-average disability concentrations. Zero-vehicle households averaged 9.6% statewide but were concentrated in 39.6% of high-burden tracts. LEP persons averaged 8.6% statewide and exceeded that share in 30.8% of tracts (RIDSP, 2020; U.S. Census Bureau, 2018).

These figures are consistent with national patterns. ACS disability prevalence among community-dwelling civilians is approximately 13–14% (U.S. Census Bureau, 2018, 2024). Working-age adults with disabilities experience poverty at more than twice the rate of those without disabilities (Houtenville et al., 2025; Kraus et al., 2023). Zero-vehicle households are more likely than car-owning households to live near highways and therefore to bear pollution they did not produce as drivers (Urban Institute, 2022). The resulting geography is not accidental. Interstate siting historically bisected low-income and redlined neighborhoods; remaining residents inherited both displacement’s aftermath and chronic near-road exposure (EPA, 2024; Urban Institute, 2022).

Environmental Determinants and Health Burden

Near-road exposure is a well-specified clinical risk. Living or attending school within roughly 300 meters (about 1,000 feet) of a major highway is associated with higher rates of asthma, reduced lung function, cardiopulmonary mortality, preterm birth, and related outcomes (EPA, 2024; Health Effects Institute, 2010). In Southern California cohort research, children living within 500 meters of a freeway showed significant deficits in eight-year lung-function growth independent of regional air quality (Gauderman et al., 2007). Among children with asthma, closer roadway proximity is associated with more symptom days, poorer control, and greater health-care utilization (Hauptman et al., 2020).

Developmental consequences are equally relevant to pediatric rehabilitation and early intervention. Analysis from the National Institutes of Health found that young children living closer to major roadways were approximately twice as likely to fail communications-domain screens on the Ages and Stages Questionnaire as children living farther away; prenatal and postnatal exposures to traffic-related pollutants were also associated with higher risk of screening failure across developmental domains (Ha et al., 2019). Autism-spectrum findings are more specific but directionally consistent: maternal residence within about 309 meters of a freeway at delivery was associated with elevated autism risk in the CHARGE study (Volk et al., 2011).

Rhode Island’s LQ trend line shows the spatial injustice deepening rather than resolving. The LQ for minority residents within 250 feet of interstates rose from 1.60 in 2010 to 1.93 in 2018; the LQ for low-income residents rose from 1.48 to 1.63 (RIDSP, 2020). Statewide minority share declined over the same period (23.6% to 19.1%), which makes the corridor concentration more—not less—striking. The clinical translation is direct. Chronic airway inflammation and reduced cardiopulmonary reserve decrease exercise tolerance, slow gait and endurance training, and convert a transportation corridor into a durable functional constraint. Discharge plans that ignore that constraint treat environment as background rather than as a therapeutic variable (Chakraborty, 2022; WHO, 2001).

---

Clinical Gaps and the Continuum of Care: The Psychosocial Fracture

Functional Independence and Ambulation

The ACS disability items—hearing, vision, cognition, ambulation, self-care, and independent living—map onto the activity limitations that rehabilitation programs are designed to change (U.S. Census Bureau, 2018; WHO, 2001). For clinicians, those items appear as failures or partial failures in activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental ADLs: bathing, dressing, medication management, and the ability to leave home for errands or appointments. When nearly half of high-burden tracts already exceed the state disability average (RIDSP, 2020), demand for home-based, mobile, and highly accessible outpatient rehabilitation is geographically clustered. That clustering is a systems failure of co-location: services are not where dependence is highest.

Spatial-accessibility research supports the mechanism. Higher accessibility to rehabilitation facilities is generally associated with lower disability severity, although effects vary by impairment type (Liu et al., 2023). Geospatial analyses of outpatient physical and occupational therapy show pronounced travel-time and two-step floating catchment area disparities, with low-access clusters in rural and border regions and high-access clusters in metropolitan cores (Bakhshi et al., 2025). Transportation networks shape those catchments; highway adjacency can improve clinic access while simultaneously increasing residential pollution—an irony that only an integrated equity analysis can see.

Care Transition and Transit Dependency

Transit access within a half-mile of a bus stop is a standard planning buffer and a weak but necessary link in post-acute care. In the Rhode Island analysis, the LQ for minority and low-income populations within the transit buffer was 1.54; for carless households it was 1.88 (RIDSP, 2020). These groups have proportionally higher measured transit access and absolutely higher dependence on whether that access works. With 9.6% of households having no vehicle (RIDSP, 2020; U.S. Census Bureau, 2018), a missed or inaccessible trip is not an inconvenience. It is a care-transition failure point.

The rehabilitation literature is unambiguous that environmental barriers, including transportation, predict unmet rehabilitation needs after traumatic brain injury and in mixed rehabilitation populations (Juengst et al., 2025). People with disabilities make fewer trips, face longer and more complex journeys, and miss medical appointments at higher rates when transport is unreliable (Mackett, 2025). Among patients with neurologic disability, a large share report difficulty attending clinic visits; transportation, commute time, and schedule disruption are the dominant reasons, and most require caregiver accompaniment that multiplies time burden (Hatcher et al., 2021). Non-emergency medical transportation (NEMT) interventions reduce missed appointments (pooled relative risk ≈ 0.63 in meta-analysis), although evidence on downstream utilization and health outcomes remains thinner than the access effect (Solomon et al., 2022).

In a rehabilitation workflow the stakes are physiological. Interrupted therapy cycles after stroke, TBI, spinal cord injury, or joint replacement allow deconditioning, contracture, and loss of task-specific gains. Delayed home rehabilitation after joint replacement is associated with poorer mobility recovery, with larger gaps among rural and dual-eligible patients (University of Utah / JAMDA findings summarized in contemporaneous clinical reporting; see also broader transitional-care evidence in van Gaalen et al., 2025). Rehospitalization and re-institutionalization then appear as “clinical” outcomes when they are, in substantial part, transportation-system outcomes (Solomon et al., 2022; U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration [FTA], 2021).

This is the psychosocial fracture: social isolation and service dropout produced by a hostile travel chain, then misread as nonadherence.

---

Macro-Economic Impact and Policy Analysis

The Cost of Inaction

Near-roadway developmental and respiratory harms cascade into pediatric rehabilitation, special education, and adult vocational systems (Ha et al., 2019; Gauderman et al., 2007). These are, in policy terms, avoidable secondary impairments. Value-based payment that ignores environmental and transportation determinants will systematically underprice prevention and overpay for downstream institutional care.

Poverty and disability already interact to raise long-run safety-net costs. Adults with disabilities have substantially higher poverty rates than adults without disabilities (Houtenville et al., 2025). Parents with disabilities face still higher poverty risk (Heyman et al., 2025). Households without cars are over-represented near highways (Urban Institute, 2022). The state therefore pays twice: once in pollution-attributable morbidity, and again in the rehabilitation and long-term-services budget required to manage the resulting functional loss.

The Economic Value of Coordinated Transit and Outreach

Federal programs designed to close these gaps have a documented, if uneven, record. The Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC) program targeted transportation to employment for low-income workers; New Freedom funded services beyond ADA minimums for people with disabilities (FTA, 2007, 2010). Evaluations found increased job access, travel-time and cost savings for users, and mobility gains for disabled riders, while also warning that absorption of these programs into larger formula grants after MAP-21 reduced dedicated spending on specialized services (FTA, 2010; Thakuriah et al., 2013; Transportation Research Board, 2018). Coordinated human-services transportation can reduce unit costs and shift riders from high-cost paratransit to fixed route where appropriate; TCRP synthesis work estimated large potential system savings from coordination strategies, though site-level returns vary (Burkhardt et al., 2003).

More recent FTA Rides to Wellness and Innovative Coordinated Access and Mobility demonstrations show improved appointment adherence and, in some sites, favorable cost-per-quality-adjusted-life-year estimates relative to the cost of a missed visit (FTA, 2021; Flynn et al., 2021). Medicaid expansion has been associated with higher discharge to rehabilitation after trauma and narrower demographic disparities in rehabilitation use (Zogg et al., 2019)—evidence that coverage and access infrastructure move functional outcomes, not only balance sheets.

The precise “one dollar yields three dollars” ratio sometimes used in advocacy is not a universal constant and should not be treated as such. The defensible claim is narrower and stronger: coordinated transportation that protects therapy attendance is health infrastructure, and its absence is capitalized as institutional care.

---

Strategic Reform Roadmap

Rehabilitation equity requires three linked operations: outreach (identify where environmental and social burdens concentrate), burden measurement (connect those places to health and function), and benefit design (place services and mobility where the data show need).

Recommendations for Legislators and Policymakers

1. Mandate LQ and multi-burden screening in health-system and certificate-of-need planning. Facility siting and rehabilitation-bed allocation should incorporate tract-level disability, zero-vehicle, LEP, poverty, and near-road exposure indicators, not only market demand from insured populations (FHWA, 2019; RIDSP, 2020; Chakraborty, 2022).
2. Treat environmental justice as a rehabilitation-grant criterion. Align state planning elements and CMS/ACL/DOT funding with Justice40-adjacent and EJSCREEN/CEJST-consistent geographies so capital follows burden (Council on Environmental Quality, 2022; EPA, 2024).
3. Fully fund language access. LEP prevalence of 8.6% statewide—and higher in SPG tracts—is a care-navigation barrier, not a translation courtesy (RIDSP, 2020; Haldar et al., 2023). Title VI and Section 1557 obligations should be resourced at the point of intake, therapy, and discharge.
4. Restore and modernize dedicated mobility programs. Section 5310, ICAM, and NEMT coordination should be explicitly linked to post-acute rehabilitation attendance, not only to general human-services trips (FTA, 2021; Solomon et al., 2022).

Recommendations for Health-System Administrators

1. Adopt trauma- and environment-informed assessment. Intake should record near-roadway residence, housing ventilation, heat-island exposure, and transit reliability as functional modifiers, consistent with ICF environmental factors and emerging disability–EJ science (WHO, 2001; Chakraborty, 2022).
2. Convene transit-user and disability advisory boards with authority over clinic hours, campus design, and discharge logistics. Lived-experience governance is an equity method, not a public-relations add-on (Bezyak et al., 2020; Park & Chowdhury, 2018).
3. Align discharge with zero-vehicle data. A plan that assumes private-vehicle follow-up for a carless household is a predictable failure. Home- and community-based therapy, tele-rehabilitation where clinically appropriate, and scheduled NEMT should be default pathways in high-LQ tracts (Solomon et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2023).

Recommendations for Advocacy Leaders

1. Build cross-movement coalitions. Disability rights, environmental justice, housing, and transit advocacy describe the same census tracts from different institutional angles (Chakraborty, 2020; Pulido, 2017).
2. Use SPG tract data to site clinics and mobile teams. Resource targeting should follow tracts where disability, poverty, LEP, and carless households exceed state averages—not only where real estate is cheap or philanthropic attention is already high (RIDSP, 2020).

---

Conclusion

Rehabilitation equity is not achieved by clinical innovation alone. It requires an absolute grounding in demographic and environmental data, and a willingness to treat transit, pollution, and geographic stratification as core determinants of functional independence. People with disabilities are not incidental residents of high-burden corridors; they are systematically over-represented in them (Chakraborty, 2022). When those corridors also concentrate racialized poverty and carless households, the continuum of care fractures after discharge. The field’s next decade should be judged less by new modalities inside the gym and more by whether patients can breathe, travel, and return.

---

References

Bakhshi, S. K., et al. (2025). Geospatial disparities in access to outpatient physical and occupational therapy services in Texas: Implications for health equity and rehabilitation workforce policy. Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13115661/

Bezyak, J. L., Sabella, S. A., & Gattis, R. H. (2020). Public transportation: An investigation of barriers for people with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 28(1), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207317702070

Bullard, R. D. (2000). Dumping in Dixie: Race, class, and environmental quality (3rd ed.). Westview Press.

Burkhardt, J. E., Nelson, C. A., Murray, G., & Koffman, D. (2003). Toolkit for rural community coordinated transportation services (TCRP Report 91). Transportation Research Board. https://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/tcrp/tcrp_rpt_91.pdf

Chakraborty, J. (2020). Unequal proximity to environmental pollution: An intersectional analysis of people with disabilities in Harris County, Texas. The Professional Geographer, 72(4), 521–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2020.1787181

Chakraborty, J. (2022). Disparities in exposure to fine particulate air pollution for people with disabilities in the US. Science of the Total Environment, 842, 156791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156791

Council on Environmental Quality. (2022). Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool: Technical documentation. Executive Office of the President.

Federal Highway Administration. (2019). Environmental justice and transportation: Reference guide for practitioners (FHWA-HEP-19-022). U.S. Department of Transportation.

Federal Transit Administration. (2007). New Freedom Program guidance and application instructions (FTA C 9045.1). U.S. Department of Transportation.

Federal Transit Administration. (2010). Connecting people to employment and enhancing mobility for people with disabilities: An evaluation of Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC) and New Freedom program services provided in 2007 and 2008. U.S. Department of Transportation.

Federal Transit Administration. (2021). Rides to Wellness demonstration grants program evaluation (FTA Report No. 0190). U.S. Department of Transportation. https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/2021-06/FTA-Report-No-0190.pdf

Flynn, J. M., Perk, V. A., & Sipiora, A. M. (2021). Evaluation of the Federal Transit Administration’s Transit and Health Access Initiative: Case highlights, findings, and recommendations. Transportation Research Record, 2675(9). https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211029924

Gauderman, W. J., Vora, H., McConnell, R., Berhane, K., Gilliland, F., Thomas, D., Lurmann, F., Avol, E., Kunzli, N., Jerrett, M., & Peters, J. (2007). Effect of exposure to traffic on lung development from 10 to 18 years of age: A cohort study. The Lancet, 369(9561), 571–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60037-3

Ha, S., Yeung, E., Catov, J., Chen, X., Xia, Y., Sundaram, R., & Mendola, P. (2019). Air pollution and developmental delays in children: Findings from an analysis of the Upstate KIDS study. Reported in Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2019, April 9). Kids living near major roads at higher risk of developmental delays, NIH study suggests. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/newsroom/news/040919-major-roads-developmental-delay

Haldar, S., Pillai, D., & Artiga, S. (2023). Overview of health coverage and care for individuals with limited English proficiency. KFF. https://www.kff.org/racial-equity-and-health-policy/overview-of-health-coverage-and-care-for-individuals-with-limited-english-proficiency/

Hatcher, D. W., et al. (2021). The time burden of specialty clinic visits in persons with neurologic disease: A case for universal telemedicine coverage. PM&R. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8130896/

Hauptman, M., Gaffin, J. M., Petty, C. R., Sheehan, W. J., Lai, P. S., Coull, B., Gold, D. R., & Phipatanakul, W. (2020). Proximity to major roadways and asthma symptoms in the School Inner-City Asthma Study. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 145(1). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6949366/

Health Effects Institute. (2010). Traffic-related air pollution: A critical review of the literature on emissions, exposure, and health effects (Special Report 17). Health Effects Institute.

Heyman, M., Li, F., Akobirshoev, I., & Mitra, M. (2025). Demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of parents with disabilities in the United States and their risk of poverty: Cross-sectional analysis of 2016–2020 American Community Survey. Journal of Disability Policy Studies.

Houtenville, A., et al. (2025). Annual disability statistics compendium. University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability / Center for Research on Disability. https://www.researchondisability.org/

Juengst, S. B., et al. (2025). Environmental barriers are associated with unmet rehabilitation needs after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 40(2).

Krahn, G. L., Walker, D. K., & Correa-De-Araujo, R. (2015). Persons with disabilities as an unrecognized health disparity population. American Journal of Public Health, 105(S2), S198–S206. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302182

Kraus, L., Lauer, E., Coleman, R., & Houtenville, A. (2023). 2017–2023 disability statistics reports. University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability.

Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. (1995). Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35(Extra Issue), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/2626958

Liu, Y., et al. (2023). Examining the impact of spatial accessibility to rehabilitation facilities on the degree of disability: A heterogeneity perspective. SSM – Population Health, 24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101544

Mackett, R. L. (2025). A meta-review of literature reviews of disability, travel and inequalities. Journal of Transport & Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2024.101907

Mohai, P., Pellow, D., & Roberts, J. T. (2009). Environmental justice. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34, 405–430. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-082508-094348

Park, J., & Chowdhury, S. (2018). Investigating the barriers in a typical journey by public transport users with disabilities. Journal of Transport & Health, 10, 361–368.

Pulido, L. (2017). Geographies of race and ethnicity II: Environmental racism, racial capitalism and state-sanctioned violence. Progress in Human Geography, 41(4), 524–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516646495

Rhode Island Division of Statewide Planning. (2020). Long range transportation plan 2040: Environmental justice analysis (Appendix K). State of Rhode Island. https://planning.ri.gov/sites/g/files/xkgbur826/files/documents/LRTP/LRTP-app/AppendixK.pdf

Solomon, E. M., Wing, H., Steiner, J. F., & Gottlieb, L. M. (2022). Effect of interventions for non-emergent medical transportation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health, 22, Article 799. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13149-1

Thakuriah, P., Persky, J., Sööt, S., & Sriraj, P. S. (2013). Costs and benefits of employment transportation for low-wage workers: An assessment of job access public transportation services. Evaluation and Program Planning, 37, 31–42.

Transportation Research Board. (2018). Analysis of the JARC and New Freedom programs after MAP-21 (NCHRP 20-65, Tasks 59–61). National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2018). American Community Survey 5-year estimates. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs

U.S. Census Bureau. (2024). American Community Survey: Disability characteristics (Table S1810 / S1811). https://data.census.gov

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2024). Rethinking highways for healthy communities. https://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/rethinking-highways-healthy-communities

Urban Institute. (2022). The polluted life near the highway. https://www.urban.org/research/publication/polluted-life-near-highway

van Gaalen, J. L., et al. (2025). The effectiveness of interventions on clinical and patient-reported outcomes in hospital-to-home transitions of older adults: A systematic review. European Journal of Ageing.

Volk, H. E., Hertz-Picciotto, I., Delwiche, L., Lurmann, F., & McConnell, R. (2011). Residential proximity to freeways and autism in the CHARGE study. Environmental Health Perspectives, 119(6), 873–877. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1002835

Weuve, J., Kaufman, J. D., Szpiro, A. A., Curl, C., Puett, R. C., Beck, T., Evans, D. A., & Mendes de Leon, C. F. (2016). Exposure to traffic-related air pollution in relation to progression in physical disability among older adults. Environmental Health Perspectives, 124(7), 1000–1008. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1510089

World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health. World Health Organization.

Zhang, Y., et al. (2022). Residential proximity to major roadway and progression in physical disability in older adults in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 36616–36625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18203-w

Zogg, C. K., Scott, J. W., Metcalfe, D., Gluck, A. R., Curfman, G. D., Davis, K. A., Dimick, J. B., & Haider, A. H. (2019). Association of Medicaid expansion with access to rehabilitative care in adult trauma patients. JAMA Surgery, 154(5), 402–411. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5177

---

Note on method and claims. Statewide percentages, tract concentrations, and LQ values (minority 1.60→1.93; low-income 1.48→1.63; transit LQs 1.54 and 1.88; disability 13.6% / 49.6% of tracts; carless 9.6% / 39.6% of tracts; LEP 8.6%) are taken from RIDSP (2020) and the 2018 ACS estimates that analysis used. Developmental-communication doubling and near-road respiratory findings are cited to NIH/CHARGE/Children’s Health Study literature rather than to unsourced distance-specific risk ratios. Coordinated-transportation fiscal effects are stated as directional and program-evaluated, not as a universal 3:1 multiplier.

Related Policy Coverage

For ongoing commentary and analysis: Disability Policy & Medicaid · Institutionalization & Systems · SCII State Profiles